Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMesarić, Jasna
dc.contributor.authorŠimić, Diana
dc.contributor.authorKatić, Milica
dc.contributor.authorDeilkås, Ellen C Tveter
dc.contributor.authorHofoss, Dag
dc.contributor.authorBondevik, Gunnar Tschudi
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T08:45:37Z
dc.date.available2021-01-27T08:45:37Z
dc.date.created2020-11-30T08:05:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2020, 15:e0242065 (11), 1-17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2724907
dc.description.abstractAbstract The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian trans- lation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—Ambulatory version (SAQ-AV) in the out-of- hours (OOH) primary care setting. A cross-sectional observational study using anonymous web-survey was carried out targeting a convenience sample of 358 health professionals working in the Croatian OOH primary care service. The final sample consisted of 185 questionnaires (response rate 51.7%). Psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory hierarchical factor analysis with Schmid-Leiman rotation to bifactor solution, McDonald’s ω, and Cronbach’s α. Five group factors were identified: Organization climate, Teamwork climate, Stress recognition, Ambulatory process of care, and Perceptions of workload. Items loading on the Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload factor had low loadings on the general factor. Cronbach’s α ranged between 0.79 and 0.93. All items had corrected item-total correlation above 0.5. McDonalds’ ω total for group factors ranged between 0.76 and 0.91. Values of ω general for factors Organization climate, Teamwork cli- mate, and Ambulatory process of care ranged between 0.41 and 0.56. McDonalds’ ω gen- eral for Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload were 0.13 and 0.16, respectively. Even though SAQ-AV may not be a reliable tool for international comparisons, subsets of items may be reliable tools in several national settings, including Croatia. Results confirmed that Stress recognition is not a dimension of patient safety culture, while Ambulatory process of care might be. Future studies should investigate the relationship of patient safety culture to treatment outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
dc.subjectPsykometrien_US
dc.subjectPasientsikkerheten_US
dc.titleThe safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian versionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-17en_US
dc.source.volume15:e0242065en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0242065
dc.identifier.cristin1853894
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal